Showing posts with label www.maxgax.com. Show all posts
Showing posts with label www.maxgax.com. Show all posts

GREY IMPORTS

It can often be cheaper to buy tech products from sellers based overseas,
but that discount might be down to tax avoidance

THESE DAYS, THE best price for a gadget
can be only a click away. Google even helps by
listing promoted suppliers at the top of your
search results – but when some retailers offer
goods for 30% to 40% less than others, is the
deal too good to be true? Not necessarily.
Welcome to the complex area of grey imports.
Grey importing is when products are sold
outside normal sales channels. The sale itself
is legal, but the goods are often shipped from
outside the final market, raising issues of tax,
duties, warranties and returns. The practice
also enables you to buy products that have
never been launched in this country, such as
the Nokia N1 tablet (see page 28).
So how can you spot a grey importer? The
presence of a UK phone number on a website
is no guarantee that the firm is based here.
Many such sites operate from Hong Kong,
and if you buy from one of these, your usual
consumer rights won’t apply, so check
customer reviews before buying.
A good source of ratings is Trustpilot,
which is like TripAdvisor for retailers. Most of
the reviews you’ll find on this site are glowing.
If a site isn’t mentioned on Trustpilot or found
in Google-sponsored results, it might be a
scam – you can verify this by searching for
the name plus “review” or “problem”.
COMMON COMPLAINTS
Unfortunately, not all resellers provide a good
service. Many buyers of camera kit report
receiving lenses or bodies that have been split
from kits and then repackaged, for example,
reducing their second-hand value. There have
been reports of inaccurate photos and orders,
while ‘in stock’ can be an elastic term. A wait
of five or six days is usual, but there are
stories of items not showing up for a month.
SLRHut’s customers noted that the firm
phoned them before processing their online
order, and while some appreciated the
personal touch, others objected to being
offered alternative products.
Don’t expect to receive stock from the UK
– goods may come from China, Russia or
anywhere outside Europe. Whether this
matters depends on the manufacturer.
According to several users, Olympus, for
example, will honour an international warranty
based on any valid receipt, while lens-maker
Sigma is opposed to grey imports. Apple
reportedly doesn’t care where a product was
bought, but make sure you watch out for
technical differences, such as PAL versus
NTSC or different power-supply requirements.
Since you’re not buying your goods within
the EU, you don’t get a two-year guarantee as
standard either. Grey importers usually offer
their own warranty bought in from an
international provider. If you need to claim
against it, you’ll have to send your product to
a third-party workshop.

Buying goods on the international
wholesale market and offering them direct to
UK customers isn’t illegal (although it may
involve a breach of contract somewhere), but
in today’s global market, it’s not obvious why
that should make them cheaper. Retailers
such as Cam2 and Tin Cheung advertise the
same prices online as in their Hong Kong
shops, and you’ll rarely find them for less than
the pre-VAT price in the UK. Yet much lower
prices are advertised for UK imports.
PAYING VAT
Presumably, UK suppliers know where to go
for the best wholesale deals, so might grey
imports involve an element of tax evasion?
When goods are shipped from outside the EU
to a personal customer, a tax bill is sent –
usually through the courier firm – to the
supplier (if they’ve agreed to pay it) or to the
customer. A known method of VAT evasion is
to mark packages with a value below the £15
threshold rather than the real price paid.
We’re not suggesting that any of the
companies named here are involved in this
practice, but plenty of customer stories are
doing the rounds. One affirmed that his
supplier had failed to “do an accurate customs
declaration, to dodge the VAT. My camera was
declared as a low-value toy accessory.” The
gamble doesn’t always pay off: “I’ve since
ordered a camera from another Hong Kong
firm, which was delivered after being held by
customs for seven weeks. I’ve paid the VAT
and hope to be refunded [by the supplier].”
The Home Office’s Border Force is
responsible for customs enforcement. A
spokesperson told us that the agency aims to
“disrupt any fraud that cheats UK taxpayers
and undercuts honest businesses”, and that it
carries out checks to “assess whether the
values on customs declarations are credible”.
Border Force will also “respond to any specific
intelligence about the suspected
undervaluation of goods”.

Some grey suppliers promise a refund if
you receive a tax bill. That’s highly suggestive
that there might be some attempted
misdeclaration, although it could occur due to
error. Others just state that you won’t have to
pay any tax but don’t explain why. Simply
Electronics is unusual in disclaiming
responsibility for tax and duty, correctly
warning that the customer may have to pay it.
We phoned several grey-importing
companies for details. Twice we reached
automated messages. A third supplier, based
in England but under a name listed by
Companies House as “dormant”, answered.
After four attempts to track down an elusive
manager, we gave up. Finally, at Expedite
Electronics, a woman with a professional
telephone manner answered our questions.
Did the prices include VAT? No, because “the
main company” was based in Hong Kong. Did
that mean we might get a VAT bill? No: “You
don’t have to pay any VAT and the import
duty and tax is already included.”
If companies bring goods from outside the
EU into UK warehouses and sell them on,
they’re responsible for the VAT, not the
customer. If the goods are shipped directly to
you from abroad, however, you’re probably
liable to pay the VAT on receipt. One problem
is that there’s no easy way for a consumer to
check that the tax has been paid.
GREY ADVICE
If you’re thinking of buying grey, go in with
your eyes open. First, do the research. We
found many items for hundreds of pounds
less than UK prices, but a few were cheaper in
the UK. Read the terms and conditions, which
are often on a page called FAQ or Shipping.
These range from explicit – requiring you to
return faulty goods within a limited period, for
example – to the unnerving, such as when
‘shipping insurance’ is an extra cost.
Make sure you pay by credit card, because
then the card issuer is jointly liable for

purchases of more than £100, no matter
where it’s from. Some debit cards offer
voluntary protection too. You can request a
chargeback against any card if goods aren’t
delivered, but you’ll be relying on the
cooperation of the merchant’s bank, so don’t
hold your breath for a quick resolution.
If things go wrong with a purchase, badger
the retailer until it has been put right. Insist
on a replacement or refund, not a repair – if
goods arrive faulty, cite breach of contract, a
concept understood by courts everywhere. If
necessary, log in to Trustpilot and post a
complaint: many of these companies monitor
reviews and they may reply. At worst you’re
warning others of the pitfalls.

Other ways to buy abroad
Grey imports are not the same as
personal imports. Many foreign retailers
offer delivery to the UK, leaving you to
pay the VAT and duty. Reputable New
York company B&H (www.bhphotovideo.
com), for example, usefully shows a
calculation of shipping, tax and duty
while you’re browsing an item. Foreign
eBay sales usually work in a similar way,
but misdeclaration is not unknown.
A few UK-based firms, such as HDEW
Cameras, sell grey imports. With low
prices backed by the reassurance of
English law, this could offer the best of
both worlds, although some users have
said the company could be clearer about
what you’re getting, including kit splits.
One legal way to avoid some of the
tax is to bring products with you when
travelling to the UK from outside the EU.
If the goods are worth more than £390 in
total, you must go through the red
channel and pay VAT and duty on the
rest of the value.


KNOWLEDGE HISTORY HOW TO ANIMAL LIFE CRIME CELEB GAMES MYSTERY FOOD SPACE TRAVEL FINANCE HEALTH BEAUTY TECH VEHICLE ENTERTAINMENT GARDEN PRODUCT DECORATE JOKES


4G mobile broadband free on Tesco Mobile

Tesco has removed the £2.50 premium for 4G data from
its mobile contracts, making 4G free for subscribers

Tesco Mobile has announced that 4G LTE
mobile broadband is now free for new- and
existing customers.
After being the fi rst virtual network to o er 4G in
October last year, Tesco Mobile is now following in
the footsteps of Three by making 4G free. The deal
applies to all pay monthly and SIM-only contracts.
The move means customers can get a 4G SIM-only
tari for just £7.50 per month, including 250 minutes,
5,000 texts and 500MB data. Tesco Mobile uses O2’s
network in the UK.

Simon Groves, chief marketing o cer at Tesco
Mobile, said: “After giving customers the chance to try
4G at their own pace with our fl exible 4G tari s, we’ve
seen people really benefi t from what it has to o er.
“Customers should be able to expect more
from their mobile network, so as we see demand
for 4G become more widespread, we wanted to
take a di erent approach. Introducing free 4G is a
clear example of our intention to provide all of our
customers with the very best at no extra cost.”
Tesco Mobile said that in the coming weeks is
plans to launch data bundles for pay as you go
customers and aims to expand its range of 4G
capable smartphones. It will launch the Sony Xperia
Z1 Compact and Motorola Moto X.
“As a network we hope that this move will
challenge others in the market and encourage the
industry to follow suit. We want to see 4G with no
extra cost become the norm and networks making
the very latest technologies accessible for all,”
added Groves.
Since the £2.50 4G premium has been lifted,
existing customers will receive credits on their
monthly statements.


KNOWLEDGE HISTORY HOW TO ANIMAL LIFE CRIME CELEB GAMES MYSTERY FOOD SPACE TRAVEL FINANCE HEALTH BEAUTY TECH VEHICLE ENTERTAINMENT GARDEN PRODUCT DECORATE JOKES


Why Lenovo has bought Motorola

What the Motorola acquisition means for Google, Android and the smartphone market

Lenovo has agreed to buy Motorola from Google for US $2.91bn. On the face of it that’s a big loss for Google given that it spent $12.5bn buying Motorola only in 2011. So what’s going on? Here I’ll take a look at why Lenovo has bought Motorola, why Google has sold it, and what it means for Android and the smartphone market.

Why Lenovo has bought Motorola Lenovo has operational scale, access to components, and a strong brand name in the important emerging markets of Asia and Africa. Motorola makes great products like the Moto X and Moto G, and brings a very close relationship with Google. Lenovo is buying the soft- and hardware engineering expertise required to make great phones, and bringing the ability to punt them out cheaply and at scale. Then there is the sympathies between the brands. Motorola is a strong brand in the US and south America, Lenovo in Asia. The joint venture could be a potent mix, as the two brands are quickly merged.

With the capture of Motorola Lenovo just became the third biggest smartphone maker in the world. According to Strategy Analytics the combination of Lenovo and Motorola accounted for 6 percent of global smartphone shipments in 2013. Lenovo alone shipped 45 million smartphones last year according to IDC. Furthermore Lenovo is huge in China, which is a major source for smartphone growth. And it has that ability to manufacture and roll out products on a huge scale (did we mention that?).

Motorola’s engineers can design great phones, and Lenovo can make sure they reach every corner of the world. Motorola has a full version of Android that is full-featured and easy to use, and as a huge PC- and laptop vendor Lenovo can access all the components it needs. It has one of the biggest channels to market of any tech company, and the scale to make cheaply the great things Motorola designs.

This matters because there are only two ways in the which the global smartphone market will grow. Number 1, fi rst-time purchasers in Asia and Africa. And secondly: budget smartphone purchasers in the saturated Western markets. A combined Motorola/ Lenovo will be able to make cheaply great handsets, and ship them to every market. That’s great news for them and for consumers, and poor news for the likes of Huawei, ZTE and LG.

Why Google has sold Motorola
In the short term Google has divested itself of a loss-making division. Moreover running Motorola was a distraction from Google’s core business of getting consumers to use Google services and then using the data generated to sell advertising. Running Motorola never sat easy with Google’s other Android partners, who must have felt like they were competing with their partner. Of course, buying something for $12.5bn and then selling it for $2.91bn isn’t great business. But it’s also not the full story.

You’ll read a lot about how Google has kept hold of Motorola’s patents, which will generate revenues in the future. Many analysts are arguing that Google only ever wanted Motorola’s patents – the vast majority it is keeping for itself and licensing back to Lenovo. The value of those patents to Google is known only to Google.

More hard news is that Google in fact divested of Motorola for $5.3bn, as it sold the set-top part of Motorola to IBM for $2.4bn some months ago. That leaves a $7bn loss on a loss-making business o set only by some patents of dubious value. It starts to make more sense, but what’s the real game here? Ultimately a strong Lenovo/Motorola hybrid selling large volumes of Android phones can only be good news for Google. The African and Asian markets are dominated by Android, but mostly by cut-down flavours of Google’s ‘open’ OS that don’t generate the data, or media and app sales, via which Google monetises Android. A successful Lenovo will sell Android handsets in western markets, too, increasing Android market share there.

Motorola’s expertise could ensure that those
people who get new Android phones spend money
on using them, too, and use them for all the webbased
activities via which Google generates data
and therefore ad revenue. The Android market
is hopelessly fragmented right now, but it will
consolidate around a few big brands. Samsung and
Sony have the high-end sewn up, albeit in a fi ght with
an ailing HTC. Lenovo/Motorola could hoover up the
bottom end of the market.
In the long run fewer, better Android manufacturers
is good for Google. So the strategy of selling Motorola
to the right company makes sense.
Then there’s the Samsung question. Samsung
is the most successful Android phone maker,
but famously never mentioned ‘Android’ when it
launched the Galaxy S4. Using a Samsung phone
is very much a ‘Samsung’ rather than a ‘Google’
experience, complete with Samsung stores and
services. Samsung has even hinted at moving away
from Android and on to the Tizen platform, which
would be disastrous for Google. Should Lenovo and
Motorola perform as expected Samsung becomes
less important for Android. It would be a blow to lose
Samsung, but it would no longer be a terminal blow.
The purchase and sale of Motorola could be seen as
a $7bn insurance policy agains the big phone makers
jumping from the good ship Android.
Finally, it’s worth looking at the economics of
Google buying Motorola in the fi rst place, and then
selling it for a loss.
Google is incredibly cash rich. In this period of
the company’s history it has money to spend, and
strategic goals to fulfi l in a rapidly developing market.
We won’t know for a while if buying and selling
Motorola makes sense, but it certainly doesn’t put
Google in fi nancial di culty. It’s prepared to buy its
strategic goals.
Google bought Motorola to keep an important
Android player in the smartphone- and tablet market.
It bought it for its manufacturing and design expertise,
for its patents, and to ensure Google had a stake in
the nascent Android hardware market. It certainly
didn’t buy it to make money – although I doubt it
expected to lose as much money as it has.
Given that the Nexus products Google sells in
partnership with other hardware vendors have
continued to sell in great numbers during Motorola’s
entire time in the Google fold it seems highly unlikely
that Google ever looked to run Motorola as a going
concern. Which is good because it never did.
No. I think Motorola has served its purpose for
Google. By selling it to a strong manufacturer such as
Lenovo Google will calculate that it stands to make up
its losses in future market share and revenue, as well
as shoring up the future of Android in a smartphone
world that at least hints at further fragmentation. And
it is taking up a small amount of shares in the new
Lenovo/Motorola business to indicate exactly that.
What this means for the market
Lenovo/Motorola means good, cheap, full-Android
smartphones, at scale in all corners of the world. It
means a powerful large-scale budget phone maker
dedicated in the long-term to Android. Already the
third-biggest smartphone company on the planet,
combined Lenovo and Motorola will be able to
rapidly increase market share by o ering quality
to fi rst-time smartphone buyers in Africa and Asia,
as well as the West. It has the brands to do so, the
expertise and the manufacturing clout. And it has
a visible brand in every corner of the world.
In the long term this is good news for Google,
Lenovo and Motorola, and potentially bad news for
the smaller commodity phone makers and those who
wish to see a more fragmented budget phone market.


KNOWLEDGE HISTORY HOW TO ANIMAL LIFE CRIME CELEB GAMES MYSTERY FOOD SPACE TRAVEL FINANCE HEALTH BEAUTY TECH VEHICLE ENTERTAINMENT GARDEN PRODUCT DECORATE JOKES